Comparisons › Forebet

The long-running free statistics portal (since 2009)

Footalytics vs Forebet

What Forebet does well, what it does not publish, and where Footalytics takes a different approach — stated factually, with every Footalytics claim verifiable on the public accuracy dashboard.

Side by side

FootalyticsForebet
MethodologyPublished in full (methodology page)Not formally published
Public graded recordYes — dashboard + downloadable CSV, misses includedLimited or none
Explanation layerAI chat grounded in the model's numbersVaries (stats tables or editorial)
Odds / betting contentNone — no odds anywhereCheck their pages
Free tier3 predictions on sign-upEverything is free (ad-funded)
Paid tierCredit packs from $10 · subscriptions from $18/moNo paid tier

About Forebet

Forebet is one of the oldest football prediction portals, covering ten sports and 1,200+ leagues. It is free, funded by advertising, and publishes probabilities for a huge volume of matches every day.

The site describes an "AI technology algorithm" based on statistics and mathematics; third-party coverage generally reports a Poisson-based model, though the method itself is not formally published. Inputs include form, home/away, head-to-head, weather and injuries, and live predictions update every minute in play.

  • 1X2 probabilities with up/down movement arrows
  • Predicted score and average goals
  • "Value" picks comparing its probabilities to bookmaker odds (Kelly-based)
  • Historical hit-rate statistics by colour code

Forebet ↗

Where Footalytics differs

● Every official prediction is locked before kick-off and graded against the real final score in public — hits and misses, plus a downloadable CSV of every settled pick.

● No odds and no betting language anywhere on the site — probabilities are the product, graded in public.

● A chat, not a static table: follow up on any number (why so high on the draw? what changed after the midweek game?) and the answer cites the same underlying model output.

Read our methodology →

FAQ

Is Forebet accurate?

Its published hit rates sit in the same 50–60% band that serious models reach across a season. For any prediction site, the question to ask is whether the record is locked before kick-off and auditable — and whether you can download the raw rows.

Is there a better free alternative to Forebet?

Different, not strictly better. Footalytics covers fewer leagues but explains every number in plain language, grades every official pick in public against the real score, and never shows odds. You can start free with 3 predictions.

Does Forebet use AI?

It labels its algorithm as AI/mathematical; the exact model is not formally documented. Footalytics takes the opposite approach: the statistical model is fully described on the methodology page, and the AI layer is only the explanation.

Check the record, then try it

Every number on this site is graded in public. Start free with 3 predictions.

Try it free →